|
|
|
|
|
FTC Opts In "Politicians act like jealous dogs," says James Davidson, " They want to establish their dominion over any new sphere of wealth that technology and economic development bring to the fore. To that end, they are content to impose ruinous costs on anyone who threatens to escape their thrall." There are more than two million direct shareholders of Microsoft, for example, and tens of millions of mutual fund shareholders. The actions of the Justice Department have lowered the market capitalization of Microsoft by over $100 billion. That's a loss of measurable, real wealth. James Glassman observes " the Internet intervention of government … threatens every high tech firm in America." The timeshare industry perpetually looks forward to developing effective cost savings in sales and marketing. Innovations that lower sales costs boost residual values for owners as well. The lower the percentage of the purchase price represented by intangible or repeatable expenses the higher the possible resale valuation. A promising key to reduced sales costs has been the Internet. Data mining allows a more careful targeting of legitimate prospects. Permission marketing creates a practical way to use relationship-marketing techniques at minimal expense. Data base mining and profiling have become such powerful tools that Representative Curt Weldon (R-PA) is advocating the establishment of a new government-wide data mining agency that would integrate 28 intelligence community networks as well as selected data bases from other government agencies. As reported in the AFIO weekly newsletter, Rep. Weldon wants to start right away. " In the 21st Century," he says, " you have to able to do massive data mining." Federal privacy protection legislation will be a major issue in the elections. The Clinton Administration has already staked out its policy position. It favors federal legislation restricting disclosure for commercial purposes provided there is a series of exceptions for government access to the data. "In both health and finance," Ronald Weich, a Legislative Consultant for the ACLU, testified, " the Administration favors virtually unlimited government access for health and law enforcement reasons." Enter the FTC with a reversal of standing policy. On its own initiative, not at the behest of Congress, the Federal Trade Commission has concluded that industry self-regulation is not good enough and enforceable Internet privacy standards must be written and adopted by Congress. Senator Richard Bryan (D-NV) and Senator Fritz Hollings (D-SC) introduced the bill - called the Consumer Privacy Protection Act of 2000. The Republican reaction was summarized by Representative Tom Davis (R-VA) who said, " in an election year, the Democrats like to stir things up a bit." Nevertheless, sophisticated Internet-based marketing techniques will be slowed down while the subject is debated. Industry will hold that self-regulation is sufficient and government will express concern that self-policing leaves no way to punish offending Web sites. In other words, compulsion is necessary to establish legal rights for consumers. The next President will appoint the next Chair of the FTC. The issues up for debate this fall will include:
The legislation being discussed would prohibit Internet Service Providers (ISP's) or commercial websites from
collecting, using or disclosing personally identifiable information unless they were in compliance with the legislation.
Specifically, anyone collecting name, addresses or credit card data must provide clear and conspicuous notice as
to what will be collected, how the information will be used and what disclosure policies the company follows. The
written privacy policy may not be confusing, incomplete or inconsistent. The bill requires a stringent "opt-in"
provision whereby consumers would have to grant in advance their affirmative consent before their information could
be collected and disseminated.
Although not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, privacy is an American core value viewed as a fundamental
right embodied in both the 4th and 14th Amendments and recognized by many Supreme Court precedents. The Commissioners
noted that it is preferable that new legislation is not needed because the Internet proves to be able to regulate
itself. But, if industry alone proves insufficient, consumer privacy will be protected by legislation. |
|
|
###
CURRENT NEWS: ALL HEADLINES To report broken links or other problems with
this site please contact:
©1999-2000 The Timeshare Beat |